The problem with these terms is that they are awfully used by lazy, unenriched people who just want to describe someone quick and thinking it is okay. Moderate usage of these terms are certainly OKAY, but for the most part, these two insanely popular terms are OVERUSED.
Point, blank, period. No one needs to be categorized into either of the two terms too easily. A good analogy to compare early usage of the term "bad boy" and "nice guy" is how early biologist used "plant" or "animal" when classing organisms. But as we all know, there are many species that are neither a "plant" or an "animal". For example, a mushroom is something else and seaweed is not exactly a plant. Similarly, a "bad boy" is often a generic term that makes it seem as if all men who have dark triad characteristics are "bad boys"
This myth of two different types of men can be dispelled anyways. I'm pretty sure there are lots of men who have "dark triad" characteristics but don't get much women because of their circumstances, or behavior, and whatnot. To get a woman, it's basically a series of paths that unlock her affection for you. It's not necessarily "luck" or "status" but game.
I think that instead of using these generic terms so much women should classify men by their social groups and the community that they roll with the most. An urban guy can be different from a rocker guy so to say,
Point, blank, period. No one needs to be categorized into either of the two terms too easily. A good analogy to compare early usage of the term "bad boy" and "nice guy" is how early biologist used "plant" or "animal" when classing organisms. But as we all know, there are many species that are neither a "plant" or an "animal". For example, a mushroom is something else and seaweed is not exactly a plant. Similarly, a "bad boy" is often a generic term that makes it seem as if all men who have dark triad characteristics are "bad boys"
This myth of two different types of men can be dispelled anyways. I'm pretty sure there are lots of men who have "dark triad" characteristics but don't get much women because of their circumstances, or behavior, and whatnot. To get a woman, it's basically a series of paths that unlock her affection for you. It's not necessarily "luck" or "status" but game.
I think that instead of using these generic terms so much women should classify men by their social groups and the community that they roll with the most. An urban guy can be different from a rocker guy so to say,
